Legal Opinion

Herhold v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 28, 1989No. 87 C 2619PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROVNER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1985(3) challenging employment and benefits actions taken by defendants in alleged retaliation for plaintiffs’ exercise of first amendment rights. Pending are motions for summary judgment brought by the defendants, the City of Chicago (“City"), the Chicago Fire Fighters Union Local No. 2 (“Union”) and the Retirement Board of the Firemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago (“Board”). For the reasons described below, defendants’ motions are granted.

II. FACTS 1

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Trautz v. WeismanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court v. Betts (In Re Betts)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  4. Bedford v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Trans. AuthoirtyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. United States v. LorinceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API