Legal Opinion

Bedford v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Trans. Authoirty

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-1020PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WALDMAN, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff was employed as a police officer by defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”). She alleges that she was sexually harassed at work and terminated for complaining about such conduct and because of her sex. She also alleges that she was terminated without due process. She has asserted claims against all defendants under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3). She also asserts a pendent claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against all of the individual defendants. 1

Presently before the court…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Smith v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Hargrave v. County of AtlanticDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
  3. Satterfield v. Borough of Schuylkill HavenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Harris v. SmithKline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Hodson v. Alpine Manor, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API