Cross v. Page & Hill Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Beltrami county to recover $100 upon an order accepted by defendant. Tbe answer was a general denial. The case was tried before Stanton, J., wbo made findings and as conclusion of law found that plaintiff was entitled to judgment for tbe sum demanded. From tbe judgment entered pursuant to the order, defendant appealed.
1Per curiam
Defendant was a corporation doing business at Minneapolis, and engaged in buying and selling cedar poles and posts. One E. A. Hasty, was its representative at Black Duck, in Beltrami county, and during tbe year 1909 Hasty purchased from one James Larkin poles and timber amounting to about $900. Larkin signed an order on tbe Page & Hill Company to pay a third party $100; tbe company being indebted to him at that time in excess of that amount. It was presented to Mr. Hasty, wbo indorsed it as follows: “O. K. E. A. Plasty.” Tbe assignee presented tbe order to defendant com*124pany, and payment was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lewis v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Schilling v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Dean v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garford Motor Truck Co. v. BucksonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1927
- Pillsbury Investment Co. v. OttoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- DeWitt v. Quarterback Sports Federation, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968