Pillsbury Investment Co. v. Otto
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Action in unlawful detainer to recover possession of a store described as 139 West Lake street, Minneapolis, after expiration of lease thereon. The premises were utilized by the lessee, defendant Joe Hackl, and his sublessee, defendant John Otto, as a “restaurant, cafe, tavern, or milk bar.” The trial court determined that the lessee’s option to renew the lease had not been exercised within the time provided therefor and ordered restitution. This is an appeal from the judgment entered pursuant thereto.
On September 29, 1948, a written lease covering the premises was made by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cunningham v. PatteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Dreyfus v. HirtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Schilling v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Nielsen v. City of Albert LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Redden v. Prudential Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. 0.35 of an Acre of Land, More or Less, Situated in Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Gold'n Plump Poultry, Inc. v. Simmons Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Kastner v. Dalton Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Progressive Design, Inc. v. Olson Bros. Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. v. LandesUtah Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.