Legal Opinion

Michigan Lafayette Building Co. v. Continental Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1933No. Docket No. 104, Calendar No. 36,813PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

May 29, 1924, plaintiff leased to defendant for five years, at monthly rent of $541.66 after the first year, store No. 3 in the Lafayette building, Detroit. In May, 1925, defendant was closed by order of the State banking department and vacated the building. October 20, 1926, plaintiff let stores Nos. 2 and 3 to George A. Drake & Company, at monthly rent of $1,041.66 for one year from November 1st, with option in lessee to renew for an additional nine years. The partition between stores 2 and 3 was removed, and no division of rent was made in the lease as between them. Store No. 3 had a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Meeker v. SpalsburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  3. Rafferty v. KleinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Donkersley v. LevyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Hoster-Columbus Associated Breweries Co. v. Stag Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Casper Nationak Bank v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Rockville Pike Joint Venture Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. K & R Realty Associates v. GagnonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Millison v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Kimball v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API