Donkersley v. Levy

Defendants in error sued on the common counts and-made claim that the plaintiff in error held *56and refused to pay over moneys lie had collected at their request from his servants upon debts due from the latter to defendants in error. The general issue was pleaded with notice of set-off, and August, 1876, a verdict was returned in favor of defendants in error for $3,205.10. Donkersley complains of rulings at the trial.

There was evidence conducing to make out that it was agreed between the parties in contemplation of sales of goods from day to day by Levy and Asch to persons in the service of…