Legal Opinion

In re the Alleged Contempt of Hand

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 2, 1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On motion to punish for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane V. C. (orally).

It is stipulated that the matter be now considered as if a writ of attachment had been issued to the sheriff and the respondent arrested and brought into court to answer for the alleged contempt set forth in the papers which preceded the granting of the order to show cause and the defence of the defendant is a general denial. The testimony that was taken upon the return of the order to show cause is to be considered as having been taken upon the return of the writ of attachment and the hearing as having been had under the two hundred and thirteenth rule.

In this case it…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re CarubaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Pace v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Cancellieri v. De ModicaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. In re the Negotiation of a Labor Contract for the Employees of the SurrogateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. In Re YengoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API