Legal Opinion
Pace v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 11, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). In Ex parte Robinson, 19 Wall. 505, Mr. Justice Field, speaking for the Supreme Count of the United States, said:
“The power to punish for contempts is inherent in all courts; its existence is essential to the preservation of order in judicial proceedings, and to the enforcement of the judgments', orders, and writs of the courts, amd consequently to the due administration of justice.”
This view has been adopted by this court in Turk and Wallen v. State, 123 Ark. 341, 185 S. W. 472, and Weldon v. State, 150 Ark. 407, 234 S. W. 466, 18 A. L. R. 202.
In the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Brannon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Turk & Wallen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Weldon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- In re the Alleged Contempt of HandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dennison v. MobleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Edwards v. JamesonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- James v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Garner v. AmslerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Edwards v. JamesonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984