Legal Opinion

Ganahl v. Soher

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1884No. 8441PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The plaintiffs claim title to the lot of land in controversy as the heirs at law of Henry Ganahl, who died intestate, in the state of Georgia, on the twelfth day of May, 1855. That whatever rights, if any, the plaintiffs Maria Ann and Ann Elizabeth Ganahl acquired in the premises as such *416heirs at law became barred by the provisions of the statute of limitations prior to the commencement of this action, admits of no question. The remaining plaintiff, Henry Gordon Ganahl, was born April 11, 1855. Sections 25 and 26 of the Civil Code of this state provide:

“Sec. 25. Minors are (1) males under…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cabrera v. City of Huntington ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Shalabi v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Bynum v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API