Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided April 20, 1995No. 01-93-00287-CRPublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDELL, Justice.
The State brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s orders granting five motions to suppress physical evidence pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.P.ANN. art. 44.01(a)(5) (Vernon Supp.1995). Appellee, Jay Johnson, is charged with capital murder 1.in the shooting death of Edwina Prosen, his alleged common-law wife.2 In 13 points of error, the *280State asserts the trial court erred in each order to suppress evidence obtained in five searches. We affirm all five suppression orders.
Johnson and Prosen jointly operated the Sweeny Funeral Home. They lived together in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Meek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- International Rectifier Corp. v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Kothe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Schultze v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.