Legal Opinion

Anderson, Greenwood & Co. v. Martin

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided May 3, 2001No. 14-98-01274-CVPublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSS A. SEARS, Justice (Assigned).

Anderson, Greenwood & Co. (AGCO) appeals from a take-nothing judgment in their contract suit against appellees (collectively referred to as “Nibsco”). In four issues, AGCO asserts: (1) the trial court erred in disregarding the jury’s findings that Nibsco’s breach of contract caused AGCO damages of $120,000.00 plus $750,000.00 attorney’s fees; (2) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the jury’s findings of AGCO’s tor-tious interference with Nibsco’s contract with Praxair; (3) the trial court erred in not awarding AGCO ownership…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. IKON Office Solutions, Inc. v. Eifert, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. Springs Window Fashions Division, Inc. v. Blind Maker, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  3. In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  4. DDB Technologies, L.L.C. v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. DaimlerChrysler Motors Co., LLC v. Manuel, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API