City of Richmond v. Goodwyn
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond in eminent domain proceedings. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.
This case is before us on a writ of error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond.
On November 19, 1919, a condemnation proceeding was instituted in said court by the city of Richmond to acquire, for street purposes, certain lands, a part of which belonged to the defendants in error. The commissioners appointed by the court to assess the value of such lands made and filed a report on October 23, 1920, ascertaining that the said several defendants were entitled to compensation as follows: H. W. Goodwyn, $3,151.90; J. T. Patterson, $3,-033.00; M. C. Patterson, $1,102.50—to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Appleton Water Works Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- State Highway Commissioner v. KregerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Wilburn v. RainesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bailey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Milchem Inc. v. Third Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Bartz v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. CallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Shirley v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.