Legal Opinion
Contra Costa Legal Assistance Workers v. Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1989No. 88-2779PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
Contra Costa Legal Assistance Workers, a labor union, appeals the district court’s refusal to compel Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation to arbitrate an employee grievance. The district court granted the Foundation’s cross-motion for summary judgment in the union’s action to compel arbitration. We affirm.
The union claims that the grievance of a Foundation employee, Robert Moore, was subject to the arbitration provision contained in the collective bargaining agreement between the union and the Foundation. Moore was informed that he was being laid off due to a decrease in the Foundation’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Basketball Ass'n v. SDC Basketball Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Building Materials and Construction Teamsters Local No. 216, Plaintiff v. Granite Rock Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Teamsters Local 315 v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eng. & Architects Assn. v. Community Dev. Dept. of City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 1165 v. Lukens Steel Company, Division of Lukens, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- ML Park Place Corp. v. HedreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Westinghouse Hanford Company v. Hanford Atomic Metal Trades CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Engineers & Architects Ass'n v. Community Development DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.