Teamsters Local 315 v. Union Oil Company of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Union Oil Company of California (Unocal) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Teamsters Local 315 (Union) compelling Unocal to arbitrate a dispute concerning the medical fitness of an employee who was not allowed to return to work. We reverse.
FACTS
Unocal and the Union are parties to a collective-bargaining agreement that provides for arbitration of grievances. This agreement contains strict limitations on the scope of arbitrable disputes. The Union seeks to compel arbitration of a dispute arising out of Unocal’s refusal to return an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Westinghouse Hanford Company v. Hanford Atomic Metal Trades CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Camden Board of Education v. AlexanderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local Union No. 371 v. Logistics Support GroupCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Chloe Z Fishing Co. v. Odyssey Re (London) Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 2000
- Contra Costa Legal Assistance Workers v. Contra Costa Legal Services FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.