Legal Opinion
Kittredge v. Grannis
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The defendant Arthur E. Grannis was, in April, 1908, a member of the firm of Grannis & Lawrence, stockbrokers and members of the Stock Exchange. They received from the firm of Coster, Knapp & Company securities which the plaintiff had deposited with that firm. Grannis & Lawrence sold these securities, and plaintiff has never received the proceeds. The plaintiff claims and alleges a conversion of his securities.
The action was begun in 1914. The defendant Arthur E. Grannis was a non-resident of this State and was-never served with the summons and complaint. The complaint was dismissed as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Folsom v. Mayor and Administrators of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hall v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Rothschild v. . MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Corning & Horner v. McCulloughNew York Court of Appeals · 1847
- The People Ex Rel. Dusenbury v. . SpeirNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Kittredge v. LangleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Whitley v. KlauberNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.