Legal Opinion
Ramm v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 8, 1992No. 28118-6-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.
Virginia Ramm sought a declaratory judgment against the City of Seattle that its "small animal" ordinance, Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) 23.44.048, was unconstitutional and void. Ramm also sought an injunction permanently enjoining the City from enforcing the ordinance against her. From an order denying her motion and upholding the ordinance, Ramm appeals. We affirm.
Facts
At issue in this appeal is the constitutionality of the "small animal" ordinance, SMC 23.44.048(A), which provides that up to three small animals per single-family residential structure may be kept in single-family zones. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Rosenthal v. BudackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In Re Custody of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Wellington River Hollow, L.L.C. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.