Legal Opinion
Bell v. Friedman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 9, 1925No. 24,342PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is from a judgment on the pleadings. The complaint is not a model. It alleges, in substance, that plaintiff was a tenant of Joseph Robitschek from September 3, 1920, to September 1, 1922, occupying the second and third stories of a certain building as a hotel and lodging house, using part of the rooms as a residence for herself and family; that the landlord unlawfully and wrongfully, during plaintiff’s lease, maintained and conducted underneath her premises a public liquor nuisance where intoxicating liquors were sold in violation of law, and on account thereof drunken and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Comstock v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Millett v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Simmer v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Robertson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Singer Manuf'g Co. v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Gostomezik v. GostomezikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- United States v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942