Legal Opinion
Gostomezik v. Gostomezik
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 2, 1934No. 29,714PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 253 N.W. 376. Action to quiet title. The plaintiff is the widow of Stephen Gostomezik. Certain of the defendants, children of Stephen Gostomezik, answered. The plaintiff replied. The plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings. The motion was oral. It was granted. The order granting it was oral. The defendants moved for a new trial and appeal from the order denying it. The error claimed is the order granting the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
1. A motion for judgment on the pleadings is not a favored way of testing the sufficiency of a pleading. Such a motion is not a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Macomber v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Robertson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Noel v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Ryan v. LodermeierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009