Reilly v. Polychrome Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARTIN, District Judge:
I. Introduction
This case arises out of the termination of plaintiffs employment with defendant Polychrome. Plaintiff, Paul Reilly, alleges that his refusal to report to work when instructed to do so was not a material breach of his contract and that he was therefore fired without cause. He further contends that Polychrome has unfairly withheld salary payments and a severance package under his written contract. Defendants have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons explained below, defendants’ motion is granted.
II. Background
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rudman v. Cowles Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Jerome v. . Queen City Cycle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carco Group, Inc. v. MacOnachyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Gilman v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Reilly v. Polychrome CorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995