Legal Opinion

Forney v. Minard

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1993No. 92-199PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

In this appeal, from a post-judgment proceeding, appellant asks this court to determine if relief from the terms of a divorce decree was improperly denied. Appellant maintains the district court violated federal law by ordering the payment or assignment of 100 percent of his disposable military retirement income to his former wife. Appellant also contends the district court abused its discretion in ruling that the property disposition was not obtained by fraud and misrepresentation. We affirm the decision of the district court.

I.ISSUES

Appellant frames the following issues for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Squaw Mountain Cattle Co. v. BowenWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Claassen v. NordWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Doctors' Co. v. Insurance Corp. of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Burt v. BurtWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Iberlin v. TCI Cablevision of Wyoming, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State, Department of Family Services v. PAJWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ex Parte SmallwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API