Legal Opinion
Glasser v. O'Brien
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 7, 1927No. 26,162PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is from an order denying a new trial after a Verdict for defendants.
The action ivas in conversion. Plaintiff’s ownership of and right of possession to 44 horses, a pair of mules, 23 sets of harness,, and 46 blankets, valued at $8,000, which she alleges defendant seized and converted on May 7, 1923, is through a chattel mortgage executed to her by the Dakota Central Construction Company, a South Dakota corporation. Defendant as sheriff of Itasca county, Minnesota, justified under a. writ of attachment directed against property of the mortgagor, the Dakota Central Construction…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Singer v. Farmers State Bank of GoodridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Tousley v. First National Bank of Pine CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Braley v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- First National Bank v. WigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- M & M Securities Co. v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Lincoln Crest Realty, Inc. v. Standard Apartment Development of West Allis, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Mack International Motor Truck Corp. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Drew v. FeuerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Finnerty v. GerlachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929