Drew v. Feuer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Beplevin for an automobile, wherein the trial without a jury resulted in a decision for defendant Feuer, who is the only real defendant. He will be referred to accordingly. There was no motion for new trial, and plaintiff’s appeal is from the judgment.
There has been a commendable effort by court and counsel to simplify the record. It consists only of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment. In March, 1929, one Hackl was doing a retail automobile business in Minneapolis under the trade name of Selby Lake Motor Sales Co. In his employ as sales manager was one Wilcox.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gump Investment Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Secord v. Northwestern Tire Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Glasser v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Mack International Motor Truck Corp. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- Slawik v. ChristensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941