Legal Opinion

Finnerty v. Gerlach

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1929No. 27,021Published

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial and from a judgment.

Action in replevin to recover possession of the property hereinafter referred to. The case ivas tried in the municipal court of St. Paul to a jury. Verdict ivas in favor of plaintiff.

For more than seven years prior to his death, one Tuttle was the OAvner and in possession of a houseboat and certain appurtenances thereto, together with the furniture, tools and other personal property therein. This houseboat was used by him as a place of residence and was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. Simonson Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Fridley v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Aretz v. KloosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. E. S. Woodworth & Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. In Re Estate of John EklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API