Legal Opinion

United States v. Pablo Villareal Acosta

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1969No. 26843_1PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction entered after a non-jury trial finding the defendant guilty of violating the narcotics laws. Title 21 U.S.C.A. § 174.

One assignment of error centers on the admissibility of evidence seized at the time the defendant was arrested and searched. This issue was raised by a motion to suppress which was denied. A directed verdict of acquittal was due if the evidence in question, the heroin and photographs of the defendant with the heroin, was inadmissible. The other assignment of error is based on the failure of the trial court to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Eisenhauer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Stoddard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. United States v. David Wayne FreundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Almendarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API