Brunson v. Ward
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDiane S. Sykes, J.
¶ 1. In Wisconsin, under-insured motorist policies written in the amount of $25,000 have been held to be illusory contracts, and case law has required insurers to pay damages, up to the $25,000 limit of any such policy, as a remedy for the issuance of an illusory contract. Meyer v. Classified Ins. Co., 192 Wis. 2d 463, 468, 531 N.W.2d 416 (Ct. App. 1995); see also Kaun v. Indust. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 148 Wis. 2d 662, 670, 436 N.W.2d 321 (1989); Hoglund v. Secura Ins., 176 Wis. 2d 265, 270-71, 500 N.W.2d 354 (Ct. App. 1993). The question in this case is the continued viability of this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Radlein v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Kaun v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Mau v. North Dakota Insurance Reserve FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Gulmire v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Progressive Northern Insurance v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Stone v. AcuityWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.