Legal Opinion

Brunson v. Ward

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2001No. 98-3002, 98-3300PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiane S. Sykes, J.

¶ 1. In Wisconsin, under-insured motorist policies written in the amount of $25,000 have been held to be illusory contracts, and case law has required insurers to pay damages, up to the $25,000 limit of any such policy, as a remedy for the issuance of an illusory contract. Meyer v. Classified Ins. Co., 192 Wis. 2d 463, 468, 531 N.W.2d 416 (Ct. App. 1995); see also Kaun v. Indust. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 148 Wis. 2d 662, 670, 436 N.W.2d 321 (1989); Hoglund v. Secura Ins., 176 Wis. 2d 265, 270-71, 500 N.W.2d 354 (Ct. App. 1993). The question in this case is the continued viability of this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Radlein v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kaun v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mau v. North Dakota Insurance Reserve FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Gulmire v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  4. Progressive Northern Insurance v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Stone v. AcuityWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API