Akins v. Harco Insurance

{¶ 50} While I concur with the majority on the appellant’s first and second assignments of error, I respectfully dissent on the two cross-assignments of error and would reverse the trial court’s decisions on both summary judgments.

{¶ 51} The Owners insurance policy states: “We will pay compensatory damages an injured person is legally entitled to recover * * * (2) for bodily injury sustained while occupying or getting into or out of an automobile that is covered * * (Boldface sic; italics added). The majority finds that this provision is susceptible of “more than one interpretation” and then…