City of Tacoma v. Fiberchem, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
The City of Tacoma seeks to reverse the trial court's refusal to impose the City's business and occupation tax on Fiberchem, Inc., a Washington corporation that does business with customers in Tacoma out of an office in Tuk-wila. Tacoma assigns no error to the trial court's findings of fact; they are therefore verities on appeal. Beggs v. Pasco, 93 Wn.2d 682, 685, 611 P.2d 1252 (1980). The only issues before us are whether the trial court erred in refusing to make several findings of fact proposed by Tacoma, and in concluding that Tacoma did not have jurisdiction to tax Fiberchem's activities…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- General Motors Corp. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Connecticut General Life Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Daughtry v. Jet Aeration Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- American Oil Co. v. NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Margola Associates v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- General Motors Corp. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- General Motors Corp. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Lamtec Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.