Legal Opinion

Lamtec Corp. v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2011No. 83579-9PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 Lamtec Corporation, based in New Jersey, manufactures insulation and vapor barriers. It sells its products nationwide and did more than $1.1 million in business in Washington State each year during the seven years at issue here. Lamtec has no offices or agents perma*841nently in Washington but regularly sends representatives to visit customers. In 2004, the Department of Revenue (Department) determined that Lamtec’s Washington sales were subject to business and occupation (B&O) tax. Lamtec argues that under the federal commerce clause it had an insufficient nexus to Washington to be subject to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Albice v. Premier Mortgage Services of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Direct Marketing Association v. BrohlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Clemency v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Flight Options v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Flight Options, LLC v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API