Legal Opinion

Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Kurtz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1893No. 863PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellee was employed by the appellant as a brakeman on its railroad. While so employed he received personal injuries, which, he alleges, were caused by the negligence of the appellant.

Appellant’s demurrer for want of sufficient facts was overruled to the complaint; and it then answered in two paragraphs. A demurrer was sustained to the first; the second being the general denial.

William J. Davis was appointed special judge to try the case, and to his appointment appellant objected, and renewed its objections to the said special judge presiding, and proceeding to try said cause, at the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel Reid and Theodore E. Thomas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Western Assurance Co. v. McCartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. WilfongIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. New Kentucky Coal Co. v. AlbaniIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API