Legal Opinion

State v. Galusha

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 4, 1995No. 94-248PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The State appeals the dismissal of an attempted extortion charge against defendant Harold Galusha. It argues that “injury to the person” in 13 V.S.A. § 1701 includes injury other than physical harm and that the trial court should not have dismissed the charge for lack of a prima facie case. V.R.Cr.R 12(d). We agree and reverse.

The State’s information alleged that defendant delivered a letter to a female minor, in which he threatened to disclose a sexually explicit videotape to the minor’s parents and custodian unless she agreed to continue their relationship. The videotape showed defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. State v. OliverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. State v. TrucottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. State v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. IrishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. State v. DixonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. In Re JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API