State v. Galusha
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The State appeals the dismissal of an attempted extortion charge against defendant Harold Galusha. It argues that “injury to the person” in 13 V.S.A. § 1701 includes injury other than physical harm and that the trial court should not have dismissed the charge for lack of a prima facie case. V.R.Cr.R 12(d). We agree and reverse.
The State’s information alleged that defendant delivered a letter to a female minor, in which he threatened to disclose a sexually explicit videotape to the minor’s parents and custodian unless she agreed to continue their relationship. The videotape showed defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- State v. TrucottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- State v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. IrishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- In Re JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.