Legal Opinion

State v. Sebben

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 10, 2013No. AC 34655PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

The defendant, Peter J. Sebben, filed this appeal after the trial court denied his motion to dismiss the criminal charges against him. The defendant based his motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds after his plea bargain was rejected and the trial court permitted the state to file a second amended information reinstating the original charges. The state claims that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to consider this interlocutory appeal because the defendant has failed to raise a colorable claim of double jeopardy. Under the circumstances of this case, we agree…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. United States v. Daniel Gerard, United States of America v. Harold Eugene GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Little v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. State v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API