Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Gerard, United States of America v. Harold Eugene Goldstein
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 6, 1974No. 72-3128, 72-3129PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge:
Our conclusion that there must be a new trial essentially limits our consideration in this case to one ground we find sufficient in itself—the government’s coverup of its relations with its principal witness, an alleged accomplice of the defendants. The underlying facts are these. Defendants Gerard, Goldstein and DeVito were indicted on a three-count indictment in connection with counterfeit Federal Reserve notes. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 472 and 473. All three pleaded guilty to Count I (conspiracy), but at the sentencing a problem arose and the court allowed the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- People v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. Frank Grady and John JankowskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Clifton Fransaw v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Bernardino Ruesga-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.