Roberts v. Estate of Randall
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[¶ 1] This appeal primarily presents the issue whether a jury properly considered violations of certain motor vehicle statutes as evidence of negligence by persons operating *206snowmobiles. After the snowmobiles operated by Appellant Robert H. Roberts and Steven Charles Randall collided, killing Randall and partially paralyzing Roberts, Roberts and his wife Cinta (the Robertses) brought suit against Randall’s estate (Estate). At trial, the district court instructed the jury that various statutes from Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 31-5-101 through 31-5-1507, Wyoming’s Uniform Act Regulating…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Brittain v. BoothWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Stephenson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Kudrna v. Comet Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
- Holly Sugar Corporation v. PerezWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parrish v. Groathouse Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Wyoming Bank and Trust v. HaughtWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Roberts v. Estate of RandallWyoming Supreme Court · 2002