Holman v. Callister, Duncan & Nebeker
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
In this consolidated appeal, Roland Holman and Andersen’s Ford, Inc. appeal two orders of two district court judges dismissing their malpractice claims against Callister, Duncan, and Nebeker (Callister). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Because we are reviewing motions to dismiss, we recite the facts of this ease in a light most favorable to appellants. Dansie v. Anderson Lumber Co., 878 P.2d 1155, 1156 (Utah App.1994). We note that Callister’s view of the facts is less egregious.
Andersen’s Ford, Inc. was a used car dealership in Brigham City, Utah. Holman was company president and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Forty-One Thirty-Six Wilcox Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- James v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. UpchurchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bio-Thrust, Inc. v. Division of CorporationsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Capital One Bank, N.A. v. WallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Gray v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Miller v. Celebration Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Miller v. Celebration Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.