Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Dots, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 25, 1997No. C0-96-2331, C0-96-2359PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of an immunity-based motion for summary judgment under Minn.Stat. § 629.366 (1994). Because appellants are not governmental entities, they are not entitled to immediate appeal of the order. We dismiss the appeal.
FACTS
Respondent Harvey was detained by appellant Pyramid Security on suspicion of shoplifting from appellant Dots, Inc. Because Harvey had not taken anything from Dots, she sued appellants for false imprisonment. Appellants sought summary judgment under Minn.Stat. § 629.366, subd. 3 (1994),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Anderson v. City of HopkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kastner v. Star Trails Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001