Legal Opinion
Cahill v. Carella
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided May 18, 1994No. File 309812SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.
The defendant has raised, by way of a motion to strike, the question whether there should be immunity from liability for ordinary negligence where one player injures another player while participating in a sporting event. The complaint contains two counts, negligence and reckless misconduct. The defendant has also moved to strike the second count on the ground that it fails to state sufficient facts to amount to recklessness. A motion to strike admits all facts well pleaded, but does not admit legal conclusions or the truth or accuracy of opinions stated in the pleadings; the allegations of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Munn v. Hotchkiss SchoolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Benjamin Feld, Larry Feld, And Judith Feld Vs. Luke BorkowskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Benjamin Feld, Larry Feld, And Judith Feld Vs. Luke BorkowskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Hibert v. Stewart Amusements, No. Cv99335456 (Dec. 6, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Jaworski v. Kiernan, No. Cv 940464969s (Aug. 1, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.