Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Benjamin Feld, Larry Feld, And Judith Feld Vs. Luke Borkowski

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 22, 2010No. 07–1333Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAppel, Justice

This case raises two substantive issues. The first substantive issue is whether there is a special limited-duty rule for contact sports under Iowa law that applies to the game of softball. If so, a second question arises, namely, whether the contact-sports exception should prevent liability based on negligence under the facts and circumstances of this case.

For the reasons stated below, I would reject application of the contact-sports exception to softball. In the alternative, I would hold that there is a factual question regarding whether the conduct in this case was outside the scope of the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API