Legal Opinion

McDaniel Gift Shop, Inc. v. Balfe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 14, 1965No. G-156PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, DONALD K., Judge.

The appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the cross-appeal filed by the three individual appellees, the plaintiffs below, and to strike the cross-assignment of error filed by the said appellees in this appeal, on the ground that those appellees are es-topped to urge error in the judgment appealed from herein because they had accepted the benefits of the said judgment.

The rule invoked by the appellant in support of its said motion is the “accept-*589anee of benefits” doctrine, firmly established in Florida, that a party who has accepted the benefits of a judgment or…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McMullen v. Fort Pierce Financing & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Carter v. CarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Fort v. FortDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Claus v. ClausDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robert L. Wheeler, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Grant v. WesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Brown v. EpsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. Sedgwick v. ShawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Robert L. Wheeler, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API