Legal Opinion

McMullen v. Fort Pierce Financing & Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 28, 1933PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The Appellee has heretofore filed a motion to-dismiss the appeal in this case on the following grounds:

1. That appellant accepted the benefits of the decree.

2. That appellant enforced the final decree.

3. That appellant collected the monies awarded him by the final decree.

4. That appellant is estopped to appeal from said decree.

5. That the appellant disposed of his interest in the ' subject matter of this suit.

6. That the appellant has assigned his interest in said decree.

It appears from the records in the case that some years ago Appellant, F. G. McMullen, at that time president of the Fort…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilfillan v. McKeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Shaver v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. RoBards v. LambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  4. Williams v. RichardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Koch v. SachlebenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wynfield Inns v. Edward Leroux Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. White v. SpearsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Behm v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Dance v. TatumSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Giltex Corp. v. DiehlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API