Claus v. Claus
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STURGIS, Chief Judge.
Appellee seeks dismissal of this appeal on the ground that appellant has accepted all benefits of the final decree of divorce entered October 18, 1963, including alimony *27payments over a period of several months following that date and payment of the fee allowed for the services of her attorney.
In Carter v. Carter, Fla.App., 141 So.2d 591, we dismissed the wife’s appeal on the authority of McMullen v. Fort Pierce Financing & Construction Co., 108 Fla. 492, 146 So. 567. Wigginton, J., speaking for the court, pointed out that Rule 3.8(b), Florida Appellate Rules, was amended…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McMullen v. Fort Pierce Financing & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Carter v. CarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Rayle v. MerrillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fort v. FortDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- McDaniel Gift Shop, Inc. v. BalfeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Brackin v. BrackinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Hines v. HinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Fort v. FortDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964