Legal Opinion

Langhorne Manor Borough v. Clayton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1937No. Appeal, 145PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The Borough of Langhorne Manor, in an action of assumpsit, recovered, a judgment against the defendant for penalties for the violation of a borough ordinance. The defendant has appealed to this court, contending that the ordinance for the violation of which the penalties were recovered was repealed by a later ordinance.

The facts were agreed upon in the form of a written stipulation. The borough, on August 6, 1934, enacted an ordinance for the protection of the public health in the borough, providing regulations for the obtaining of permits and the construction of grease…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MeyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Haspel v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Commonwealth of Penna. v. BeattieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Commonwealth v. McNamaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Scranton City v. RoseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sekt v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Sobey v. MolonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Harr, SEC. of Bkg. v. BoucherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Philadelphia v. BartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Sunnybrook, Inc. v. Upper Dublin Township, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API