Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Bartell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1939No. Appeal, 295PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Keller, P. J.,

We are in full sympathy with the object of the City of Philadelphia in bringing this proceeding, and regret that we are obliged to set aside the decree and remit the City to some other remedy.

We assume for the purposes of this appeal that the defendant appellant, between January 11, 1937 and February 1, 1937, flagrantly violated provisions of the Building Code for Cities of the First Class, approved May 1,1929, P. L. 1063, with special reference to section 4302, relating to building over area ways; and also violated certain provisions of the Philadelphia Zoning…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haspel v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Commonwealth of Penna. v. BeattieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Commonwealth v. McNamaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Beckershoff Et Ux. v. BombaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. Salary BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeBlasiis v. Bartell & OlivetoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Seidl's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API