Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance Company v. Wolford

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1975No. B-4957PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Chief Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the controlling issue is whether Pat Wolford, our Respondent, was an employee or an independent contractor. Trial was to a jury which found that he was an employee. Judgment was entered upon the verdict for Wolford. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 515 S.W.2d 364. We find no evidence to support the jury’s finding that Wolford was an employee; and accordingly, we must reverse the judgments of the courts below.

The solution to the question presented here is reached through the application of the test of right of control.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newspapers, Inc. v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Anchor Casualty Company v. HartsfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Elder v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Standard Insurance v. McKeeTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Continental Insurance Co. v. WolfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITY v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bell v. VPSI, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Gray v. Baker & Taylor Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Mary Kay Inc. v. Woolf, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API