Mary Kay Inc. v. Woolf
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice FITZGERALD.
Appellee Claudine Woolf was an independent sales director for Mary Kay Inc. in March 1997 when she learned she was pregnant with her first child. The same month, Woolf was diagnosed with cancer. Woolf ultimately brought suit against Mary Kay Inc. under a California statute, alleging Mary Kay failed to accommodate her disability. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Woolf, and the trial court’s judgment adopted the jury’s verdict except for its award of punitive damages. In this Court, Mary Kay argues there is legally insufficient evidence supporting the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- St. Joseph Hospital v. WolffTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Marathon Corp. v. PitznerTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pulley v. Milberger, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Bell v. VPSI, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Randy v. Squires Construction, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Emerson Electric Co. v. American Permanent Ware Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Verdugo v. Alliantgroup, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.