Legal Opinion
James G. Freeman & Associates, Inc. v. Tanner
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1976No. Civ. 36214PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
On this appeal 1 by Tanner from a judgment in favor of Freeman, her former broker, the major question is whether the trial court properly concluded that under the oral contract of the parties Tanner was obligated to repay unearned advanced commissions after the termination of the contract. For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that the judgment in favor of Freeman must be affirmed.
Viewing the record most strongly in favor of the judgment, the following pertinent facts, adapted from Freeman’s brief, appear: Tanner was a sales representative for Freeman between…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crail v. BlakelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Mason v. Drug, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- McDonald v. FiliceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Birsner v. BollesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- State Credit Corp. v. RangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by9 opinions
- 24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. Superior Court of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC v. HernandezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Harris v. TAP Worldwide, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Enrico Farms, Inc. v. H. J. Heinz Company, Robert Palladino, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Contadina Foods, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Beggerly v. GburCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.