Legal Opinion

Enrico Farms, Inc. v. H. J. Heinz Company, Robert Palladino, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Contadina Foods, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1980No. 77-3760PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Palladino appeals the District Court’s Order and Partial Summary Judgment in favor of the defendant Contadina Foods, Inc. (Appellee) on his two ancillary contract claims. Palladino was an intervenor in the antitrust case of Enrico Farms, Inc. v. H. J. Heinz Company. We affirm. Palladino sought to prove the breach by Appellee of two written contracts for the sale and purchase of processing tomatoes by means of parol evidence to interpret or explain the contracts.

Palladino is a California grower, harvester and seller of processing tomatoes. Appellee buys and processes tomatoes. The first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Royal Industries, a Corporation v. St. Regis Paper Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. James G. Freeman & Associates, Inc. v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Thomas W. Bell v. Exxon Company, U. S. A., a Division of Exxon Corporation, a Corporation and Humble Oil & Refining Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Penny Grosz-Salomon v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, a Provident Company Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Sicor Ltd. v. Cetus Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Sierra Diesel Injection Service, Inc. v. Burroughs Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Sierra Diesel Injection Service, Inc. v. Burroughs Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. 1995-1 Trade Cases P 70,945, 26 Ucc rep.serv.2d 686 Sicor Limited Alco Chemicals, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants, and Sicor S.P.A., Counter-Defendant v. Cetus Corporation Cetus Generic Corporation Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc. Ben Venue Generic Corporation and Erbamont N v. and Cetus-Ben Venue Therapeutics Erbamont, Inc. And Farmitalia Carlo Erba, S.R.L., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API