Legal Opinion
Wilson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 22, 1989No. 484-87CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Judge:
This military pay case comes before the court on motions for summary judgment filed by the parties, together with stipulated facts as to quantum.1 At issue is whether plaintiff was denied a right to remain on active duty under 10 U.S.C. § 1163(d).
Facts
Plaintiff enlisted in the United States Army in 1963. He subsequently was commissioned as an officer in the United States Army Reserve and in the Regular Army and was discharged as a captain on February 1, 1980, having, at that time, some 16 years of active duty service. Plaintiff then became a member of the Army Reserve and,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lieutenant Colonel Albertis Wilson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Ulmet v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Green v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Lieutenant Colonel Albertis Wilson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Lieutenant Colonel Juan M. Mata v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992