Legal Opinion
Lieutenant Colonel Albertis Wilson v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 17, 1990No. 89-1598PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
In this case, plaintiff, an officer in an Army reserve component, sought back pay, retirement pay, reinstatement and correction of records. His claim was based on 10 U.S.C. § 1163(d), the “sanctuary” provision, which provides that members of a reserve component are, under specified circumstances, protected from involuntary release prior to qualifying for retirement. Before us is an appeal from a judgment of the Claims Court entered May 22,1989, and reported as Wilson v. United States, 16 Cl.Ct. 765 (1989). Both Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Wilson and the United States moved…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ltc. Oliver Donovan Ulmet v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ltc. John F. Mitchell v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Preminger v. Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- New York Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Khandelwal v. Compuadd Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- McLaughlin v. New York, Governor's Office of Employee RelationsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.