Legal Opinion

Clark v. Campbell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1973No. 25744PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

Written on reassignment, this cause presents the question of sustaining a defendant’s after-trial motion because plaintiffs’ verdict directing instruction failed to negate affirmative defenses instructed upon at the request of the defendant.

Plaintiffs initiated suit on a contract for the construction of a house against the defendant contractor. Defendant, by his amended answer, set up an affirmative defense of interference by the plaintiffs with his performance. Upon trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $1,200, and defendant filed a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Smith v. Old Warson Development CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Corbin v. WennerbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Whaley v. Milton Const. & Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Flannery v. St. Louis Architectural Iron Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. French v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. North County School District R-1 v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Missouri State Highway Commission v. Hensel Phelps Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. Stevenson v. First National Bank of Callaway CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. French v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API