Clark v. Campbell
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Judge.
Written on reassignment, this cause presents the question of sustaining a defendant’s after-trial motion because plaintiffs’ verdict directing instruction failed to negate affirmative defenses instructed upon at the request of the defendant.
Plaintiffs initiated suit on a contract for the construction of a house against the defendant contractor. Defendant, by his amended answer, set up an affirmative defense of interference by the plaintiffs with his performance. Upon trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $1,200, and defendant filed a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Smith v. Old Warson Development CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Corbin v. WennerbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Whaley v. Milton Const. & Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Flannery v. St. Louis Architectural Iron Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- French v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- North County School District R-1 v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Missouri State Highway Commission v. Hensel Phelps Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Stevenson v. First National Bank of Callaway CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- French v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995