Marcus Dairy, Inc. v. Belford (In Re Naugatuck Dairy Ice Cream, Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS; STAY OR ABSTAIN; AND SANCTIONS UNDER RULE 9011
ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
This adversary proceeding is the procedural format employed by the defendant’s predecessor, a chapter 11 debtor, to object to a claim it filed in the plaintiff’s name and assert a counterclaim. The plaintiff (“Marcus”) moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for a stay of the proceeding or abstention. In addition Marcus seeks sanctions against the defendant and his counsel under Bankruptcy Rule 9011.
BACKGROUND
Marcus has commenced an action in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Castlerock Properties, Debtor. Piombo Corporation, a California Corporation v. Castlerock Properties, a California Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Andrus v. Charlestone Stone Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Republic Reader's Service, Inc. v. Magazine Service Bureau, Inc. (In Re Republic Reader's Service, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Roddam v. Metro Loans, Inc. (In Re Roddam)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- Gibbons v. Stemcor USA, Inc. (In Re B.S. Livingston & Co.)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- In Re National Cattle CongressUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Carabetta Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Asbury Park (In Re Carabetta Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Durso Supermarkets, Inc. v. D'Urso (In Re Durso Supermarkets, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.